A woman who lost her job after expressing views that sex cannot be changed and transgender women are “not women” has won an appeal against an employment tribunal.

In 2018, Maya Forstater posted a number of tweets expressing her beliefs about sex and gender, including her opposition to proposed reform of the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) which would allow trans people to self-identify and legally transition from the gender assigned to them at birth without a medical diagnosis.

Her contract with her employer, the think tank Centre for Global Development (CGD), was not renewed in 2019 after a number of her colleagues complained, prompting an employment tribunal where she argued her beliefs should be legally protected.

After the verdict was handed down on Friday morning, she said: “I am delighted to have been vindicated. I lost my job simply for expressing a view that is true and important, and held by the great majority of people in this country: sex matters.

“Being a woman is a material reality. It is not a costume or a feeling. Institutions that pretend sex doesn’t matter become hostile places for women, in particular.

“After this judgment, employers and service-providers that ignore sex and silence women who object, need to consider whether they are acting unlawfully, and the substantial legal risks they face if they do not change their approach.”

However, the judge did add in the ruling that: “This judgment does not mean that those with gender-critical beliefs can ‘mis-gender’ trans persons with impunity.

“The claimant, like everyone else, will continue to be subject to the prohibitions on discrimination and harassment that apply to everyone else.”

Mr Justice Chowdhury admitted that “some trans persons will be disappointed by this judgment”, adding that he did “not agree” that it would “create a ‘two-tier’ system between natal women and trans women, with some trans women fearing that it will give licence to people seeking to harass them”.

Amanda Glassman, executive vice president of CGD, said: “The decision is disappointing and surprising because we believe Judge Tayler got it right when he found this type of offensive speech causes harm to trans people, and therefore could not be protected under the Equality Act.

“Today’s decision is a step backwards for inclusivity and equality for all. We’re currently considering the various paths forward with our lawyers.”

Author JK Rowling previously supported Ms Forstater’s case, tweeting: “Live your best life in peace and security.

“But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?”

Related posts:

Cute albino wallaby baby will have guests bouncing in excitement as zoo opens after lockdown Third COVID wave could occur in late summer if reopening continues, scientists warn Team GB move to fourth in Olympic medal table after sailing and equestrian golds The race is on to vaccinate up to 1.4 million 16 and 17-year-olds before schools reopen Three people charged in connection with death of five-year-old Logan Mwangi in Wales Southgate praises players’ maturity during Hungary game but says repeated racist abuse is ‘unfortunate’ ParalympicsGB surpasses London medal haul in Tokyo, but will fall short of Rio total with one day left Alpaca experts complain to PM – and say Geronimo was ‘dragged kicking and screaming’ to his death Parts of England and Wales could see heatwave next week with temperatures of 29C PM to use ‘every economic, political and diplomatic lever’ to help Afghans left behind by UK Death of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes should prompt ‘urgent’ change in social care, former minister says Sarah Everard inquiry will inform govt on policing and protection of women issues