Rebekah Vardy has denied “orchestrating” a photo of footballers’ wives and girlfriends at the 2018 World Cup, on the third day of her High Court libel trial against Coleen Rooney.

Vardy is suing Rooney, 36, after she publicly accused her of leaking “false stories” to the media in 2019.

Coleen Rooney’s barrister picked up where the court left off yesterday discussing exchanges Vardy had with her agent about organising a photographer.

David Sherborne referred to a message exchange between Vardy, 40, and Caroline Watt, her PR and agent at the time, in which Ms Watt said she had “got a photographer sorted for tomorrow” and Vardy replied “OK”.

Lawyer asks Rebekah Vardy why she is ‘pulling a face’ – live updates

Vardy said Ms Watt had arranged for a photographer to take pictures of her as she left her hotel, but denied giving the photographer the location of either the hotel or a restaurant she went to the same evening with a group of the England team’s wives and girlfriends.

She said she was “happy” to be photographed leaving the hotel but claimed that updates she sent to Ms Watt when plans changed throughout the evening were not because she was working with the agent to arrange a “pap shot” of the group as they left the restaurant.

Peter Andre speaks out after Rebekah Vardy’s ‘chipolata’ jibe, says ‘I’m the butt of all jokes’

Vardy v Rooney: Rebekah Vardy denies leaking Coleen Rooney stories as she gives evidence for the first time in Wagatha Christie trial

Wagatha Christie trial live: Trial paused as Rebekah Vardy gets upset – after lawyer earlier asked why she was ‘pulling a face’ during questions on ‘staged’ pics

Mr Sherborne said if the photographer had purely been arranged for Vardy, he or she wouldn’t have needed to know how they were getting to the restaurant.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘I had been drinking’

Vardy told the court she can’t recall the conversation with Ms Watt that well and said she thinks there were several cars to take the women to the dinner.

Mr Sherborne suggested that a message to Ms Watt which said “I have bought about 10 minutes” referred to the fact Vardy was delaying some of the women from posting a group photo on social media because a photographer hiding in the bushes had taken a picture of them all and they “didn’t want to lose their exclusive”.

Vardy responded: “Well, it reads like that, I don’t recall it like that and if I’m being honest… I had been drinking.”

Vardy again denied having orchestrated the photograph, during a further exchange with Mr Sherborne, adding: “If I had intentionally arranged the picture… I would quite happily admit that I had.”

Other key points from today

Witness statements repeatedly revised

Vardy’s witness statements were repeatedly revised before the start of the libel trial, the court heard.

Elements of her witness statement that related to the alleged staged photo had varied throughout the disclosure process, Mr Sherborne said.

Reading her original witness statement, he said: “‘The claimant had nothing to do with the photograph which was published in The Sun on June 26 2018. She did not arrange a photographer to be present and received no payment’. You didn’t arrange a photograph?”.

Read more:
‘Wagatha Christie’ case explained
Vardy says she was ‘just joking’ amid claim she leaked ‘affair’ story

She replied: “Yes, that’s true.”

He then read an amendment from July 2021 which said: “‘The claimant did not orchestrate the picture that was published in The Sun'”.

Mr Sherborne said: “What’s gone from that is that you no longer say you had nothing to do with the photograph that was published.”

Vardy said Mr Sherborne was “confusing” her when asked if both statements were true, before later going on to say: “Sometimes you make mistakes.”

He claimed she was lying about this, which she denied.

Vardy was also questioned about a post Rooney shared on her Instagram about her car – a Honda.

Rooney is defending the libel claim on the basis of truth and public interest.

The court previously heard that both women have spent “hundreds of thousands of pounds” on the case so far, with the total costs of the case expected to be at least £2 million.

The High Court trial is set to last for about seven days, with a judgment expected at a later date.

Rooney is expected to give evidence on Friday.

Related posts:

She’s found! ‘Guardian angel’ who saved man having a stroke says there’s no need for thanks UK reports another 9,284 COVID cases and six deaths Woman stole gems worth millions by swapping them for pebbles using ‘sleight of hand’, court hears Goto Energy becomes 13th supplier to collapse as gas prices surge Households will be able to apply for £5,000 grant to replace gas boilers as new scheme unveiled Fewer women trust police after Sarah Everard murder, poll suggests Counter-terror police formally identify Liverpool bomber and trace relative Children as young as seven at risk of child marriage in UK, campaigners warn Bald roller skater wanted by police over indecent exposures in London Prince Harry launches libel claim against publisher of the Daily Mail Child Q: Case of girl, 15, being strip-searched by police ‘should horrify us all’ Prisoner who escapes police van wearing only underwear and socks hunted by authorities