Tories split over £15bn cost-of-living handout - with some worrying it is 'socialism' and risking further inflation

Rishi Sunak, a devotee of Nigel Lawson, believes in a smaller state, curbing borrowing, lower taxes and combating inflation.

Yet again, he delivered a major fiscal announcement where he did the opposite.

Today’s £15 billion spending splurge expanded the role of the state with the advent of one-off financial transfers, could stoke inflation, add to borrowing and contains a multibillion-pound tax rise.

One day he will be able to give the budget he wants; though maybe not while Boris Johnson is prime minister.

Today’s targeted, progressive package left the opposition Labour party and think tanks that worry about the low paid cheering.

Almost inevitably, it divided Tory MPs. Most were happy it delivered palliative care for voters facing unprecedented squeeze – Mr Sunak did get gratitude for reaching into his pocketbook once more.

But some immediately worried it amounts to “socialism” while others fear Mr Sunak is at risk of permanently higher spending and more inflation, which could prompt higher interest rates.

Windfall tax ‘damaging’ for net zero plans and energy security, businesses say

Cost of living: Why Rishi Sunak’s populist windfall tax is facing a backlash

Sunak unveils £15bn package and U-turns on windfall tax to help Britons ‘hit hard’ by cost of living surge

There is an unease on the Tory benches about what economic conservatism means in today’s party.

It is not clear today’s statement will have clarified dividing lines with Labour at the next election.

What wasn’t spelt out might even be more costly. As Sky’s economics editor Ed Conway points out, the throwaway promise about benefits and pensions rising next year with 9%-plus inflation, reinstating the triple lock; may ultimately cost more than the whole of today’s package altogether.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Again the path of public spending is potentially permanently higher. Everybody in the Commons chamber knew it was never meant to happen today.

Originally pencilled in for August, three weeks ago it was brought forward to July, then at the weekend it was going to be in June, and it was not even certainly going to be today, until yesterday.

This should not ordinarily matter, nor should the charge that this is some kind of distraction away from the Sue Gray report that landed yesterday, even though the timing is inevitably linked.

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts,  Google Podcasts,  Spotify, Spreaker

However, the danger now is that this looks like a short-term fix. Could it become just the first of many such interventions?

There are already heavy hints of tax cuts in the Autumn budget even before today’s £15bn has been noticed by voters.

Mr Sunak borrowed the language of his early COVID press conferences to make the announcement – promising government is on your side in unprecedented circumstances.

The eventual bill was far far higher than anyone predicted. Maybe Dominic Cummings was right when he said Mr Johnson’s main lever to hold voters and MPs in his spell is ever-higher spending.

Read Entire Article