A pair of House Republicans on Sunday offered widely contrasting views of whether lawmakers should pursue changes to gun law in the wake of the elementary school shooting in Uvalde, Texas.

In an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks said Americans feared losing their Second Amendment rights and that any changes to laws must not infringe on them.

“If there are proposals out there that guarantee the rights of the American people to freely exercise their Second Amendment right to bear and keep arms then I’ll consider them,” Brooks told host Sandra Smith. “But if you’re talking about depriving people of their Second Amendment right to bear arms, well, first, it’s unconstitutional.”

Democrats have called on Republicans in the wake of the shooting, which killed 19 students and two teachers and injured over a dozen more, to join them in their long-stalled efforts to reform gun laws. Many Republicans have pointed to mental health, not guns, as a key driver in mass shootings. Brooks took it a step further Sunday, attributing the rise in shootings to a “decline in the moral values, the decline in the respect for human life.”

Brooks, who recently qualified for the runoff for the Republican nomination for a Senate seat in Alabama, pointed to the 2017 shooting at a congressional baseball practice, of which he was a target, and said the blame for such incidents of violence lies in the motivation.

“What we have to do is stop the motivation that causes these criminals, these horrific individuals to do what they do,” Brooks said.

It’s not clear what, if anything, motivated the shooter in Texas to kill young children.

Brooks’ comments marked a significant contrast from the position taken by Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger, who in interviews on CNN’s “State of the Union” and ABC’s “This Week” said his views on gun laws have evolved recently. The moderate Republican said among other changes he was open to raising the age to purchase long guns to 21.

“If you look at this shooting, you look at Buffalo, you look at Parkland and all these others, there are people taking these guns, these ARs, under the age of 21,” Kinzinger told CNN host Dana Bash. “Can we stop all of it? No. Can we mitigate it, certainly. And we should be doing that now.”

Asked whether he stilled opposed a ban on sales of the type of firearm used in many recent shooting, Kinzinger said he was open to it, depending on the specifics. But he was adamant that supporters of the Second Amendment such as himself should be coming to the table with “reasonable” solutions.

“My side’s not doing that. My side’s not coming forward with reasonable ways to defend an amendment that we think is very important,” Kinzinger said. “And so I’m looking at this going, fine, if people are going to put forward solutions about certifying maybe who can buy an assault weapon, I’m certainly open to that.”

Related posts:

Unhappy Congress, uncertain cash — but the Capitol fence could stay GOP mulls throwing Biden more infrastructure money Murkowski has the moxie to take on Trump. Will she? Fraternal Order of Police lobs Congress a warning on police reform talks Kinzinger on McCarthy’s Jan. 6 investigation threat: ‘Who gives a s—?’ Gaetz pushes Biden to defend sprinter Sha’Carri Richardson after marijuana suspension Biden huddles with Pelosi as Dem dealmaking intensifies Dems weigh ditching Medicare expansion and paid leave in eleventh hour of social spending talks Pelosi on BBB bill: ‘If you are an American this bill is for you and it is better’ Romney: 10 years later, Russia remains ‘geopolitical foe’ McConnell speaks out against Greene and Gosar’s appearance at white nationalist event ‘The president will get his way’: Congress likely can’t stop new Iran nuke deal