Alan Bates, who led the campaign for justice in the Post Office Horizon scandal, says he will reject the compensation he has been offered by the government.

The former sub-postmaster, whose 20 year fight inspired the ITV series Mr Bates vs The Post Office, told The Daily Telegraph the offer was “offensive” and “cruel”.

The government confirmed plans for “full and fair compensation” to sub-postmasters affected by the scandal in 2022.

But Mr Bates said the compensation offer had been “around a sixth” of what he requested and told the newspaper: “‘Full and fair’ might be His Majesty’s government’s interpretation, but in reality the offer is derisory, offensive and after all this time, yes, cruel.

“I will absolutely be turning this offer for financial redress down.

“It’s just a terrible way to treat human beings – and I have heard from several sub-postmasters who have received similarly derisory offers, while others are still waiting.”

Read more:
What is the Post Office scandal?
Distressed sub-postmasters say Horizon system ‘still causing mystery shortfalls’

Woman who died after Post Office conviction may have suffered miscarriage of justice

Kemi Badenoch confirms sacking of Post Office chair – but says issues ‘go beyond’ Horizon IT scandal

‘Need for new leadership’ at Post Office as chairman Henry Staunton ousted, Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch says

He said the offer had been made on Wednesday, 111 days after his claim – prepared with the help of forensic accountants engaged by his lawyers – had been submitted.

“I have been in the queue along with all the others in the scheme, but if my case is an example of the way they are going to treat all cases, we may as well start looking at a legal action again and let the judiciary decide.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Mr Bates was among more than 500 people who received an average of about £20,000 after a High Court ruling in 2019.

A government spokesman told the Daily Telegraph: “If any applicant to the GLO (Group Litigation Order) scheme feels that they are owed more than is being offered, we are happy to discuss the evidence with their legal advisers.

“If we can’t agree, decisions will be made by an independent panel that includes legal and accountancy experts, who ensure fair redress based on the evidence.”

Related posts:

England star Jadon Sancho says ‘hate will never win’ as he hits back at online racist abuse Boy, 13, died after leaving school bus early and jumping off Tower Bridge into Thames Liverpool bomber died in blast from IED he made with ‘murderous intent’, coroner rules Prince Andrew and Virginia Giuffre settlement: What do we know and what happens next? Lionesses face World Cup holders USA in Wembley friendly – live updates Dramatic changes in most common non-UK countries of birth – who makes the new top 10? Junior doctors invited for pay talks in bid to avert next week’s strike PM hopes BBC Lineker row ‘can be resolved in a timely manner’ and says matter not for the government Peaky Blinders makers ‘strongly disapprove’ of ‘homophobic’ video shared by DeSantis campaign Police watchdog launches investigation into woman’s claim she was sexually assaulted in custody ‘Embarrassing’: Council spends £2.7m on bus hub with no buses Woman found guilty of murdering one-year-old girl she was adopting