MPs have rejected a series of Lords’ amendments to the government’s Rwanda bill – as a week of parliamentary showdown on the legislation begins.

The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill is currently in the middle of what is known as ping-pong, where the two houses propose, debate and vote on amendments.

So far, the Lords has proposed one set of amendments, all of which the Commons defeated.

And now a second set of Lords’ amendments have been rejected by MPs – this bill will return to the Lords on Tuesday for further scrutiny.

There was little deviation in today’s debate from the previous times the Commons has considered the legislation.

Politics latest: Sunak and Starmer call for ‘restraint’

Opening the debate, Home Office minister Michael Tomlinson said: “Here we are back again debating the same issues and amendments we have already rejected.

WhatsApp tips to social media monitoring: The online security advice given to MPs

‘Why do politicians never answer the question?’ – Your Westminster FAQs

Deputy PM Oliver Dowden to warn of China cyber threats as ‘senior UK politicians targeted’

“We are not quite at the point yet of completing each other’s sentences, but we are almost there.”

Crunch week for bill

The government has made time in both the Commons and the Lords this week for more debating and voting to take place, with Downing Street hoping to get royal assent this week.

The Safety of Rwanda Bill aims to allow the government to send asylum seekers who arrived illegally in the UK to Rwanda, addressing concerns raised by the Supreme Court last year.

Part of the legislation declares Rwanda “safe”, and prevents judges from considering how safe Rwanda is, if someone appeals against being deported.

The Lords will consider the legislation on Tuesday afternoon.

The amendments they imposed have sought to address a slew of issues, including allowing appeals on the basis of safety, how underage asylum seekers are looked after, considerations around modern slavery concerns, and whether those who have served for or with the British armed forces should be exempted from deportation.

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Related posts:

UK to send 1,000 more ventilators to India as it battles surge in COVID cases Queen says ‘reconciliation’ in Northern Ireland ‘cannot be taken for granted’ From fuel prices to energy bills: What to expect from the chancellor’s spring statement Key element of Brexit deal ‘practically useless’, says Tory MP group Leaks suggest government has conceded to party rebels over illegal migration bill This G7 summit stands out as memorable – and not just because Zelenskyy jetted in Facial recognition technology labelled ‘Orwellian’ as Home Office eyes wider use Safe places for drug consumption should be piloted in UK, MPs recommend Plans for UK’s first facility for safer consumption of illegal drugs approved Safer drug consumption rooms could spell trouble for the law if the idea works Tony Blair, Sir Keir Starmer and JK Rowling among mourners at Alistair Darling memorial Ofcom oversight of BBC to be extended to news website articles