The Scottish government’s legal challenge against Westminster’s decision to block its much-debated gender reform bill starts today.

The hearing is due to take place at the Court of Session in Edinburgh from 19-21 September.

The case will be heard over the three days by Lady Haldane.

Read more:
Why is the bill controversial?

The Scottish government will present its argument first, with the UK government following.

A procedural hearing was held last month in which both parties told Scotland’s highest civil court they are ready to present their cases.

Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville confirmed in April that Holyrood would lodge a legal bid to contest the UK government’s use of a Section 35 order to stop the bill from receiving royal assent and becoming law.

East Ayrshire: Girl, 9, dies after crash involving bicycle and tractor in New Cumnock

Lewis Budge charged with murder of Robert Bromell who died after being hit by ambulance in Oban

Scottish football team jokingly accuse Elon Musk of ‘stealing’ their logo for SpaceX

The reform bill

The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill was passed by MSPs just before Christmas.

It aims to simplify the process for trans people to change gender in the eyes of the law. No diagnosis or medical reports would be required, and the period in which adult applicants need to have lived in their acquired gender would be cut to three months.

Teenagers aged 16 and 17 applying for a gender recognition certificate would have to live in their acquired gender for at least six months.

Critics have argued the proposals undermine women’s rights and single-sex spaces.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

In October last year, Ash Regan quit as community safety minister shortly before MSPs began debating the first stage. A total of seven SNP MSPs broke the whip to vote against it.

It then became a constitutional dispute in January when the UK’s Scottish Secretary Alister Jack took the unprecedented step of using Section 35 of the Scotland Act to prevent the bill from gaining royal assent.

Mr Jack claimed the bill clashed with UK-wide equality laws and argued differing systems of gender recognition north and south of the border would create “significant complications”.

First Minister Humza Yousaf has previously insisted that if the Scottish government had failed to challenge the use of Section 35 this would send a “signal that the UK government can veto any legislation they disagree with at a whim”.

The SNP leader added that legal action was the “only means of defending our parliament’s democracy from the Westminster veto”.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the UK government had taken “very careful and considered advice” on the issue.

In response to the Scottish government’s legal challenge, the UK government said it would “robustly defend” Mr Jack’s decision.

Related posts:

No ‘free-for-all’: Wales set to move to alert level zero – but FM warns it ‘does not mean end of restrictions’ Geronimo the alpaca set to die after No 10 refuses stay of execution ‘Sausage war’ truce holds as UK indefinitely extends grace period for post-Brexit checks PM refuses to rule out more tax rises ahead of next election as he defends National Insurance hike 12 to 15-year-olds to get ‘final say’ over COVID jab if disagreement with parent occurs Raab in The Hague to offer UK’s help to prosecute Russian war crimes in Ukraine Shapps denies ‘total lie’ he ‘wrecked’ RMT talks as second day of rail strikes looms Government backs making public sexual harassment a criminal offence ‘Very important we listen to the DUP,’ says Irish PM with Windsor Framework still in balance Health secretary ‘willing to engage’ with junior docs on strike but 35% pay rise demand ‘unreasonable’ Labour pledges to reverse ‘collapse in solving crime’ with expert panel Diane Abbott accused of ‘exploiting tragedy’ in now-deleted tweet over migrant deaths