NatWest says an external review has found no evidence of political or other such discrimination in the closure of customer accounts at its Coutts arm, amid the Nigel Farage debanking row.

The bank, which commissioned the law firm Travers Smith to investigate the affair, said 84 customer account closures – including all relevant PEP (politically exposed person) cases over a two-year period from July – were examined.

They represented, the taxpayer-backed lender said, a total sample of around 10% of relevant account closures in the period.

“The report confirms that decision-making was consistent with relevant standards and otherwise appropriate and that there was no evidence of discrimination due to political views or affiliations, or any other protected characteristic,” the bank stated.

It added that there were several areas where Coutts’ policies and procedures regarding customer “exit decisions” had been identified and it would implement all recommendations.

They included guidance on how the bank communicates with customers regarding such decisions.

The update was issued several months after the first phase of the review found “a number of shortcomings” in the process of closing Mr Farage’s account at Coutts.

Computer programmers, butchers and chefs top the workers that might be missing in 2024

Energy price cap hike to help suppliers recover record level of unpaid bills

Online retailer Temu sues fashion giant Shein, alleging ‘Mafia-style intimidation’

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The Travers Smith report said that while the decision was predominantly made on a commercial basis, as it was deemed loss-making for the bank, he had been poorly treated.

Shortcomings included how Coutts had communicated with the former UKIP and Brexit Party leader and how it treated his confidential information, the review found.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said potential “regulatory breaches and a number of areas for improvement” were identified.

These included NatWest’s processes on how it considers potential account closures and customer complaints as well as the effectiveness of governance mechanisms.

Former chief executive Dame Alison Rose left the state-backed lender after she admitted making a “serious error of judgment” by speaking to a journalist about Farage’s banking at Coutts.

Mr Farage, who returned to the UK this week after a stint in Australia for TV’s I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here, has refused to accept the outcome of the review and alleged that the banking industry has effectively cancelled thousands of PEP and other customers deemed not to fit their respective culture.

A crackdown on laws in this area will include forcing UK lenders to consider UK-based PEPs as lower risk compared to those from overseas.

Mr Farage, who is rumoured to have earned £1.5m for his time in the jungle and is yet to comment on the latest findings of the review, is bringing a legal case against the bank and Dame Alison.

He says the findings of a subject access request suggested the closure was taken partly because his views did not align with the firm’s “values”.

Related posts:

Bank of England governor downplays fears of deep COVID scarring Changes in assumptions about how long people live help Phoenix profits soar Train and bus operators will no longer enforce mask wearing in England from 19 July One in five hospitality and retail workers self-isolating, MPs told Wage growth, record fuel prices and a virtual fashion week Heathrow warns on investment as regulator eyes reduction in passenger charges Rolls-Royce pay award to avert strikes, retail sales fall and mince pie maker deals with soaring costs Goldman lures ex-Bank of England chief as international chair Disgraced crypto boss ‘donated stolen customer funds to politicians’ Russia hikes interest rates as rouble plummets Next lines up £100m FatFace in latest high street takeover deal Caramac bars to be discontinued after more than 60 years