The US Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Jack Daniel’s in a trademark dispute with a dog toy company’s toilet-themed product resembling the signature whiskey bottle.

A lower court had ruled in favour of VIP Products in 2020, which argued that its “Bad Spaniels Silly Squeaker” dog toy used Jack Daniel’s brand “to convey a humorous message” and the toy was an “expressive work” and had not tainted the brand.

However, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the ruling.

“It is not appropriate when the accused infringer… has used a trademark as a trademark,” Justice Elena Kagan said when announcing the ruling.

“[This] does receive special first amendment protection.”

Justice Kagan said the lower court had made a mistake with the “expressive work” argument and, going forward, the case would focus on whether “the Bad Spaniel marks are likely to cause confusion” for consumers.

“This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two items seldom appearing in the same sentence,” she added.

‘The Old No. 2’ on your carpet

VIP Products has been selling its Bad Spaniels toy since 2014 and has since added to its own Silly Squeakers line of chew toys which mimic liquor, beer, wine and soda bottles, including “Mountain Drool” – a parody of Mountain Dew – and “Heini Sniff’n” – resembling Heineken beer.

Its most noticeable parody yet is its “Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey” toy, which includes the wording: “The Old No. 2 on Your Tennessee Carpet.”

The Jack Daniel’s bottles have the words: “Old No. 7 brand” and “Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey”.

The original bottle notes it is 40% alcohol by volume and the parody features a dog’s face and says it is “43% Poo by Vol.” and “100% Smelly”.

Read more on Sky News:
Analysis: The case against Trump will rock the US
Unexpected symptoms of poor air quality revealed as smoke blankets parts of US

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Sky News app for free

The toy, which sells for around $20 (£16.23), also notes in small font: “This product is not affiliated with Jack Daniel Distillery,” on its packaging.

Jack Daniel’s lawyers argued that the toy misleads customers, profits “from Jack Daniel’s hard-earned goodwill” and associates its “whiskey with excrement”.

The Supreme Court did not decide whether VIP had violated trademark law but instead sent the case back for further review.

Related posts:

US East Coast braces for blizzard bringing up to 2ft of snow and 70mph winds Man who spent 20 years in jail released after twin confesses to murder Contraceptive pill for males is 99% effective in preventing pregnancy US abortion debate promises a noisy and divisive road ahead Buffalo shooting ‘carried out by sick, demented individual fuelled by diet of hate’ who is now on suicide watch 76 million-year-old meat-eating dinosaur skeleton to be auctioned Man who created fake online fundraiser for veteran spent money in Vegas and on designer bags Boy, 10, ‘shot mother dead after she refused to buy him VR headset’ Royals’ overshadowed US trip to end with Biden meeting and Eilish at prizegiving Prince of Wales announces five winners of Earthshot Prize What are spy balloons? And why could they play a key role in the future of aerial reconnaissance? China threatens ‘further actions’ over US downing of suspected spy balloon