The Duchess of Sussex says a “precedent” had been set after the publisher of the Mail on Sunday was denied its request for a trial over claims it breached her copyright and privacy.

It follows the publication of excerpts of a letter written by Meghan to her father.

Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) was trying to overturn a decision not to go to trial made by a High Court judge earlier this year.

Today, the Court of Appeal said it is “hard to see what evidence could have been adduced at trial that would have altered the situation”.

The Duchess said in a statement: “This is a victory not just for me, but for anyone who has ever felt scared to stand up for what’s right.

“While this win is precedent setting, what matters most is that we are now collectively brave enough to reshape a tabloid industry that conditions people to be cruel, and profits from the lies and pain that they create.”

Meghan said in a statement that from “day one”, she had treated the lawsuit as an “important measure of right versus wrong”.

Claims Prince Charles asked about skin colour of Harry and Meghan’s children dismissed as ‘fiction’ by palace

A royal mess: Meghan and the letter of the law

Meghan’s text messages revealed: Harry faced ‘constant berating’ from Royal Family

The defendant, she claimed, “treated it as a game with no rules”.

She went on: “The longer they dragged it out, the more they could twist facts and manipulate the public (even during the appeal itself), making a straightforward case extraordinarily convoluted in order to generate more headlines and sell more newspapers – a model that rewards chaos above truth.

“In the nearly three years since this began, I have been patient in the face of deception, intimidation, and calculated attacks.”

Seeking to widen the argument, Meghan said: “As far removed as it may seem from your personal life, it’s not. Tomorrow it could be you. These harmful practices don’t happen once in a blue moon – they are a daily fail that divide us, and we all deserve better.”

Meghan, 40, sued Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) – publisher of the Mail on Sunday – over five articles which reproduced parts of a letter she sent to her father, Thomas Markle, in August 2018.

The duchess won her case earlier this year when a High Court judge ruled in her favour without a full trial – on the basis that ANL’s publication of the letter was unlawful.

But ANL appealed and argued during a three-day hearing last month that the case should go to trial on Meghan’s claims – including breach of privacy and copyright.

In the judgment published on Thursday, the Court of Appeal assessed whether the previous judgment had been correct.

It upheld the decision that the duchess had a “reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of the letter”.

It added: “These contents were personal, private, and not matters of legitimate public interest. The articles in the Mail on Sunday interfered with the Duchess’s reasonable expectation of privacy.”

Referring to the decision made earlier in the year, the court said: “The judge had been in as good a position as any trial judge to look at the article in People magazine, the letter and The Mail On Sunday articles to decide if publication of the contents of the letter was appropriate to rebut the allegations against Mr Markle.

“The judge had correctly decided that, whilst it might have been proportionate to publish a very small part of the letter for that purpose, it was not necessary to publish half the contents of the letter as ANL had done.”

Last month, the court was told the duchess’s letter was “written with public consumption in mind as a possibility”.

Jason Knauf, who was Prince Harry and Meghan‘s media adviser until March 2019, said “the duchess indicated in messages to me that she recognised that it was possible that Mr Markle would make the letter public”.

Related posts:

Babyboo Instagram advert on Halloween fashion banned for objectifying women CCTV screens ‘went white’ after Manchester Arena bombing, event manager tells inquiry Caution urged as lockdown eases – but end of restrictions in June ‘still very likely’ More than 2,300 cases of Indian coronavirus variant now in UK, health secretary says In pictures: England celebrates as hugs, indoor pints, overnight stays and foreign travel return Prince Harry, who served in Afghanistan, on the Taliban resurgence British woman convicted over Cyprus gang rape claim ‘anxious but upbeat’ ahead of Supreme Court appeal ‘It doesn’t sound enough’: Call for sentence of mother of murdered toddler Star Hobson to be reviewed ‘Each six months’ of pandemic will be better than the last, says chief medical officer Woman who put jab on ‘back burner’ urges others to get vaccine – as hospital staff brace for another spike Three men arrested after 73-year-old killed in Lancashire bridge collapse ‘Tip of the iceberg’: Child protection referral numbers rise