A woman who spent 20 years in jail for killing her four children has had her convictions officially quashed.

Kathleen Folbigg was convicted in 2003 of murdering three of her children, and of manslaughter in the death of her fourth between 1989 and 1999 in New South Wales, Australia.

She was pardoned in June after evidence proving her innocence came to light but has now had the convictions officially expunged by the state.

Her lawyer now says she is preparing to claim “substantial” compensation.

Folbigg maintained her innocence and said the children had died of natural causes over a decade, from 1989 to 1999.

In 2019, an initial inquiry into the case reaffirmed her guilt, but in 2022, a second inquiry found new evidence suggesting two of the children had a genetic mutation that may have caused their deaths.

Folbigg was released from prison in June this year after being pardoned.

Australia: Record December heat in Sydney as temperatures hits 43.5C

Jax Wilson: Toddler who was snatched in street in Australia found 180 miles away

Australia: Man dies after being buried in sand on Bribie Island

“I am grateful that updated science and genetics has given me answers as to how my children died,” an emotional Folbigg told reporters outside a criminal appeals court in Sydney.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

“However, even in 1999, we had legal answers to prove my innocence. They were ignored. And dismissed,” she said.

“The system preferred to blame me rather than accept that sometimes, children can and do die suddenly, unexpectedly, and heartbreakingly.”

Read more:
Kathleen Folbigg, mother pardoned for child deaths
Daughters may have died due to ‘incredibly rare’ genetic mutation
Scientists call for convicted child killer Kathleen Folbigg to be pardoned

Folbigg’s lawyer, Rhanee Rego, said her legal team was preparing a claim for “substantial” compensation for her wrongful imprisonment.

“I’m not prepared to put a figure it, but it will be bigger than any substantial payment that has been made before,” she said.

The case, which relied predominantly on circumstantial evidence, caused controversy among scientists and statisticians, some of whom were part of the campaign to secure Folbigg’s release.

“Although there was new scientific evidence (in 2019) …basic scientific principles were not adhered to from the time of
trial,” said Anna-Maria Arabia, chief executive of the Australian Academy of Science.

“Make no mistake, without law reform, these sorts of miscarriages of justice will continue.”

Related posts:

Hong Kong pro-democracy paper Apple Daily announces closure UK sanctions Equatorial Guinea leader’s son who bought Michael Jackson’s crystal-studded glove ‘This is just the beginning’ – Biden imposes new Cuba sanctions after protests crackdown President Putin will not attend COP26 climate change summit, Russian officials say Ukraine president says his forces still control Kyiv and appeals to ‘friends’ abroad to join fight ‘I am ready – this is war’: Thousands of volunteers rally to fight for Ukraine’s spontaneous army ‘Liberated’ after a month underground – but still living in fear of more Russian attacks Why does the West doubt Russia’s vow to ‘cut back’ Kyiv operations? UK pledges extra £286 million emergency aid to Afghanistan as humanitarian crisis grows Man who survived on ketchup for 24 days at sea to get new boat – from Heinz ‘Any blackmail is doomed to failure,’ defiant Putin warns after attempted rebellion Canada withdraws 41 diplomats from India over murder dispute