The High Court has granted an appeal against its own ruling last month that the government’s scheme to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is lawful.

The controversial policy was introduced under Boris Johnson, but has been pushed forward by his successors as part of their plans to tackle small boats crossings in the Channel.

Campaigners have said it is a “cruel policy that will cause great human suffering”, and fought through the courts to stop people being sent to the country.

Politics live: Results of teachers’ strike ballot in England and Wales expected today

In December, Care4Calais, the Public and Commercial Services Union, Detention Action, and eight asylum seekers brought their case to the High Court, along with a second case from Asylum Aid.

Their lawyers argued the plans were unlawful and that Rwanda “tortures and murders those it considers to be its opponents”.

But representatives from the Home Office argued the agreement between the UK and the country provided assurances that everyone sent there would have a “safe and effective” refugee status determination procedure.

Disused cruise ships could house asylum seekers – as government due to spend £2.3bn a year on hotels

Rishi Sunak vows to clear immigration backlog – but dodges questions on leaving European Convention on Human Rights

Suella Braverman defends ‘compassionate’ and ‘rational’ Rwanda deportation plan after court rules scheme is lawful

Lord Justice Lewis ruled the first people who were set to be sent to Rwanda had not had their circumstances “properly considered” by the then-home secretary Priti Patel.

As a result, their cases would be referred back to the current minister, Suella Braverman, “for her to consider afresh”.

However, while he said the home secretary should look at people’s “particular circumstances” before deporting them, the overall scheme was “consistent with the refugee convention”.

After today’s ruling by Judges Clive Lewis and Jonathan Swift, the groups and asylum seekers will be able to take their cases to the Court of Appeal.

The policy was announced by Mr Johnson last April, with the first flight set to take off two months later.

But the deportation was blocked by a last-minute ruling from the European Court of Human Rights, which imposed an injunction preventing any further flights until the conclusion of legal action.

We have contacted the Home Office for a response.

Related posts:

Anas Sarwar becomes new Scottish Labour leader – 10 weeks before Holyrood elections PM’s ‘widespread concern’ over Greensill row – as Labour claim ‘return of Tory sleaze’ Chair of watchdog which exposed civil servant’s Greensill role not seen ‘anything like it’ Commons Speaker backs allowing MPs to bring babies into debates ‘Absolute nonsense’: Lawyers question Met’s call to water down report into Downing St parties Strikes ‘likely’ to go ahead as minister warns public to prepare for ‘substantial disruption’ Beth Rigby on Sunak v Truss.. plus an interview with Sir Keir Starmer Lib Dems call for £3bn mortgage protection fund to help families with ‘Tory property premium’ Baroness Michelle Mone takes a leave of absence from House of Lords amid PPE contracts controversy Stephen Flynn’s coup may have been bloodless – but he has bruising battles ahead Baroness Michelle Mone loses Conservative whip amid PPE contracts controversy UK orders thousands of new anti-tank weapons in £223m deal