Prince Andrew and his ex-wife have been named in a High Court ruling on a case featuring an elderly Turkish woman and a Turkish businessman.

A judge has been told that “substantial funds” were paid to the Duke and Duchess of York.

The pair were then named by deputy High Court judge David Halpern in a recent ruling on the case, which covers a dispute between Nebahat Isbilen, who is in her 70s, and London-based businessman Selman Turk.

Mrs Isbilen had required assistance moving her assets out of Turkey after her husband was put in prison due to his “political affiliations”, the judge was told.

Former banker Mr Turk had agreed to help Mrs Isbilen to relocate her assets out of reach of Turkish authorities.

The elderly woman has since alleged that Mr Turk “breached fiduciary obligations he owed to her” and “advances claims in deceit”.

The litigation is ongoing, with Mr Turk fighting the case, but a number of preliminary rulings have been published.

Prince Andrew’s appearance by his mother’s side shows Royal Family believes he is still one of them

Prince Andrew accompanies Queen to Prince Philip’s memorial service

Prince Andrew to attend Duke of Edinburgh’s memorial service – reports

Judge Halpern said a lawyer representing Mrs Isbilen had told him, in an affidavit, that information had emerged to show evidence given by Mr Turk was “misleading”.

He said solicitor Jonathan Tickner had told him how evidence showed that “money was used for purposes unconnected with Mrs Isbilen, e.g., substantial sums were paid to Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and to Sarah, Duchess of York”.

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts,  Google Podcasts,  Spotify, Spreaker

The judge added that barrister Dan McCourt Fritz, who represents Mrs Isbilen, had told him the “total sums which his client claims were misappropriated” amounted to some $50 million (about £38 million).

“Mr Turk has provided explanations for approximately two-thirds of these sums, most of which have been allegedly spent on professional or other fees or lost in bad investments,” judge Halpern added, in his ruling.

“No explanation at all has been given for the remaining one-third.”

A spokesperson for Prince Andrew said they were unable to comment on an ongoing court case.

Related posts:

Decorated Met officer convicted of possessing child abuse video wins appeal against sacking Train fails to beat London-Glasgow record by 21 seconds Cop to face misconduct hearing after allegedly taking Jaffa Cakes without paying full price Man guilty of murdering schoolgirl at family’s Chinese takeaway in Wales UK announces rise in COVID deaths and cases as latest 24-hour figures revealed ‘Surreal’: Charles delights Prince’s Trust members by icing cupcakes during visit with pop star Cheryl Cambo oil field owner reveals no tax to pay on project ‘for years’ due to ‘attractive’ UK rules COVID pass required at cinemas, theatres and concerts in Wales from next week British police help save woman in danger more than 3,000 miles away Three-year-old boy dies just days after M4 crash that also killed his sister BBC apologises and pays Diana’s private secretary ‘substantial sum’ over way Bashir obtained 1995 interview Emiliano Sala was ‘deeply unconscious’ from carbon monoxide poisoning before plane crashed, inquest concludes