Tory MP Chris Pincher has lost his appeal against an eight-week suspension from the Commons following groping allegations made against him.

The Commons Standards Committee announced the sanction in July following an investigation into the claims and whether the former deputy chief whip caused “significant damage to the reputation of the House” – a breach of the members’ code.

Rayner gets new role in Labour reshuffle – follow latest

Mr Pincher – who resigned from Boris Johnson’s government over the allegations last summer – did not appeal against the breach, but argued to the Independent Expert Panel (IEP) that the punishment was disproportionate.

But in today’s report, the IEP said his arguments were “misconceived or erroneous”, adding: “The sanction is far from being arbitrary or disproportionate.”

Mr Pincher resigned as deputy chief whip in June 2022 after reports he had he groped two men while drinking at the Carlton Club in central London, and was later suspended by the Conservative Party.

An investigation by Commons Standards Committee gave details of the allegations, with a House of Lords employee saying Mr Pincher had stroked his neck and squeezed his bottom.

The second complainant – a civil servant – said he touched his bottom before moving his hand to touch and squeeze his testicles.

The watchdog said Mr Pincher’s conduct had been “completely inappropriate, profoundly damaging to the individuals concerned, and represented an abuse of power”, and that his actions would “significantly impact public perception of the House and its members”.

As a result, it recommended the hefty suspension, which is enough to trigger a recall petition in his constituency – and could in turn lead to a by-election.

Mr Pincher told the investigation that he did not remember the events that took place that evening, but apologised to all parties involved.

However, he confirmed in July that he would appeal the sanction, claiming the incidents had happened when he was in the club in a personal capacity and denied his behaviour had caused significant damage to the reputation of the House and its members.

He also claimed there were “inconsistencies, anomalies and gaps in the evidence” which he argued “don’t present a complete picture”.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive Breaking News alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News App. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Related posts:

Bottles thrown at police called to break up COVID rules-busting party As pub gardens and shops reopen in England, PM urges nation to ‘behave responsibly’ MPs to pay tribute to Prince Philip as UK parliaments return early from Easter This year’s climate summit in Glasgow is last hope for limiting global warming, minister to warn Boy, 10, killed in dog attack – armed police destroy animal COVID self-isolation rules in England set to be scrapped by the end of next week Children at risk: Cuts to alcohol addiction treatment coincide with increase in parents’ heavy drinking ‘Up to a third’ of fish and chips shops face closure due to food shortages Uber driver says he ‘could have died’ after witnessing car flip onto train tracks Parents using junk food to make up for not being able to afford holidays and days out Police officer charged with assaulting 14-year-old McDonald’s manager contradicts ex-PC’s evidence about Wayne Couzens’ flashing