Apple is facing a lawsuit that could see British iPhone owners receive compensation over allegedly defective batteries.

The case, brought by consumer champion Justin Gutmann, was given the go-ahead by a UK court on Wednesday.

Mr Gutmann claims the tech giant deceived up to 25 million customers by “throttling” their devices without their knowledge.

It did so via software updates that diminished the performance of older handsets over time, the lawsuit claims.

The models allegedly affected include the iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S, 6S Plus, SE, 7, and 7 Plus.

Mr Gutmann has accused Apple of exploiting its market dominance in the UK by effectively forcing people to pay for replacement batteries or entirely new phones.

Should the case – which Apple has described as “baseless” – be successful, all owners would be entitled to compensation for each impacted model they owned.

Read more:
What you need to know about iOS 17
iPhone 15’s a great device – but innovation hard to come by

The US firm has strongly denied any batteries in its handsets were defective, apart from a few iPhone 6S models.

In those instances, it offered free battery replacements.

“We have never – and would never – do anything to intentionally shorten the life of any Apple product, or degrade the user experience to drive customer upgrades,” it said in a statement.

“Our goal has always been to create products that our customers love, and making iPhones last as long as possible is an important part of that.”

Apple previously admitted slowing down the performance of older iPhones with flagging batteries, but said it was necessary to protect their components.

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Sky News app for free

‘Major step to consumer justice’

Apple tried to get Mr Gutman’s lawsuit thrown out, but the Competition Appeal Tribunal has now ruled it can go ahead, although it said the case lacked some “clarity and specificity”.

It has asked Mr Gutmann’s legal team to resolve the issues before any trial, and he may also be required to alter his funding arrangements.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The claimant described the court’s ruling as “a major step towards consumer justice”.

“This paves the way for millions of consumers to receive the compensation they deserve,” he added.

Mr Gutman is seeking damages of up to £1.6bn, with the midpoint range being £853m.

Apple previously paid $113m (£93m) to settle a similar case in Arizona, and $500m (£413m) to settle another in California.

Related posts:

Renowned Scottish climber dies in avalanche on K2, charity says Tory councillor to pay ‘substantial’ damages to Corbyn over doctored photo at scene of Liverpool terror attack Russian music conductor resigns from Edinburgh International Festival over Putin links Pfizer vaccine less effective at preventing infection in younger than in older children, study suggests Prince Louis ‘was on a complete sugar high’ at the Jubilee Man jailed for at least 38 years for stabbing neighbour to death Firefighter who tried to tackle racism in service doubts things can change for the better ‘I know I didn’t say the words’: Michael Vaughan denies making racist comments Frank Skinner breaks down in tears on live radio as he reveals friend’s fight for life Braverman ‘committed’ to legal requirement for professionals working with children to report sex abuse Man dies in hospital after ‘attack’ as two suspects previously charged due back in court Woman says she was ‘strip-searched and left in police cell for 16 hours without clothing’