Prince Harry has filed a claim for a judicial review over a Home Office decision to not to allow him to privately pay for police protection for himself and his family during a visit to the UK.

A legal representative for Harry said he wants to bring his son Archie and seven-month-old baby daughter Lilibet to visit from the US, but fears they will be “unable to return to his home” because it is too dangerous.

The duke wants to fund the security himself, rather than ask taxpayers to foot the bill after he stepped down as a senior member of the Royal Family along with wife Meghan Markle in 2020, to seek financial independence in California.

Harry is now arguing his private protection team in the US does not have access to UK intelligence information which is needed keep his wife and children family safe.

The legal representative for the duke said in a statement: “The UK will always be Prince Harry’s home and a country he wants his wife and children to be safe in.

“With the lack of police protection, comes too great a personal risk.”

The representative added: “The Duke and Duchess of Sussex personally fund a private security team for their family, yet that security cannot replicate the necessary police protection needed whilst in the UK.

Duchess of Sussex: Meghan gets £1 damages over Mail On Sunday privacy case after paper disclosed letter to father

Harry and Meghan: First picture of couple’s daughter Lilibet is released

Year In Review – climate, royals, space and tech

“In the absence of such protection, Prince Harry and his family are unable to return to his home.”

Harry briefly returned from the US last year for the unveiling of a statue of his late mother Princess Diana, back in July.

The day before, he met seriously ill children and young people at a WellChild garden party and afternoon tea in Kew Gardens, west London.

However, it is understood the duke’s car was chased by photographers as he left.

Harry has shared his concerns in the past about his family’s safety after Diana died in a car crash after she was chased by the paparazzi in Paris in 1997.

The legal representative added: “Prince Harry inherited a security risk at birth, for life. He remains sixth in line to the throne, served two tours of combat duty in Afghanistan, and in recent years his family has been subjected to well-documented neo-Nazi and extremist threats.

“While his role within the Institution has changed, his profile as a member of the Royal Family has not. Nor has the threat to him and his family.”

Related posts:

‘Things are utterly dire’: Family of missing Sarah Everard ‘distraught’, says uncle Man held over Sarah Everard disappearance arrested on suspicion of murder, as police search woods Lottery winner ‘who took eyes off road to get teddy for son’ cleared of killing woman by dangerous driving Defence secretary self-isolating after armed forces chief tests positive for coronavirus No early release from COVID restrictions, PM suggests The Queen visits Irn Bru factory as she tours Scotland for first time since Duke of Edinburgh died COVID data shows jabs cut risk of hospitalisation and death – but you need to read it with clear head Team GB claim six medals on day four with historic swimming and gymnastics success Wales to make teaching of black, Asian and ethnic minorities’ histories mandatory in schools Two men arrested over killing of journalist Lyra McKee in Northern Ireland Use 111 online service before going to A&E for non-life-threatening care, NHS boss says Motorist aimed gun at police parliamentary protection officer after London car chase