Like most of its regular users, Elon Musk loves to hate on Twitter, usually via the medium of Twitter.

Early on the morning of 9 April 2022, he sent a tweet observing that some famous people don’t post very often, asking: “Is Twitter dying?”

It was a valid, if overblown, question, but at that point, Musk was in talks to join the social network’s board of directors, which made it an odd opinion to fire off in public.

So, later that day, Twitter’s new chief executive, Parag Agrawal, politely asked Musk to stop.

“You are free to tweet ‘is twitter dying?’ or anything else about Twitter,” he texted, “but it’s my responsibility to tell you that it’s not helping me make twitter better in the current context”.

To an outside observer looking back, this seemed like a calm, adult response to trying circumstances. At the time, Musk didn’t think so.

He threw what can only be described as a tantrum, texting Agrawal, “What did you get done this week?” and writing “I’m not joining the board. This is a waste of time,” before vowing to buy the company instead.

Elon Musk’s Twitter deal back on – and he says it’s the path to creating ‘everything app X’

Elon Musk debuts Tesla’s first humanoid robot with eye on mass market

Musk’s Starlink broadband company will seek exemption to sanctions so it can cover Iran

These text messages were released as part of the court case between Musk and Twitter, which was launched when – spoiler alert – Musk’s eventual purchase failed to go through.

After initially committing to buy Twitter for $44bn (£38.4bn), he quickly backed out, citing concerns about the number of spam bots on the platform.

You might say – well, that’s what happens when you sign a contract without doing any due diligence.

Or you might say – if you’re worried about spam bots, prove that they’re having a “material adverse effect” on the business, the high bar you need to demonstrate to wriggle out of the deal.

And indeed, that’s what Twitter did say, suing Musk to enforce the contract.

The court case wasn’t going especially well for Musk, not least because it was leading to embarrassing disclosures about his personal contacts.

Now he’s had yet another change of heart, saying he will honour his contract and buy Twitter, and throwing off a tweet to his 107 million followers about his plans to turn it into “X, the everything app”.

No doubt this gnomic statement will inspire many thousands of words of earnest analysis, but given recent history, why should we take it seriously?

If he was really going to go through with the deal, wouldn’t Musk have put out a joint statement with Twitter? If he was serious about his plans, wouldn’t he have developed them, at least to the point of coming up with, well, a plan?

Reading Musk’s public statements and private texts, it’s hard to avoid the impression of a man who made an expensive purchase in a fit of pique, before having second thoughts when he realised what he’d got himself into.

The context here is that the recent downturn in the markets means Musk has not only lost a substantial portion of his personal wealth, but also made the price he paid for Twitter in April seem embarrassingly high.

Yes, Musk has agreed to buy Twitter, but he said that before and then declared the deal he’d signed “on hold”.

Don’t bet on a deal going through just yet.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

If you’re shaking your head or rolling your eyes at this point, spare a thought for Twitter’s employees, who have had to endure months of uncertainty and barracking from their possible future boss. Imagine how they feel.

And yet, behind the posturing and the tantrums, Musk does occasionally have a point. Twitter certainly has lots of problems, not least the fact that it’s known in tech as the place where nothing ever gets done.

When Musk texted Mr Agrawal, “What did you get done this week?”, he was expressing a widely held view in Silicon Valley. Twitter should be a titan. Instead, in the words of Mark Zuckerberg from over a decade ago, it’s “a clown car that drove to a goldmine and fell in.”

Read more
Musk’s Starlink broadband company will seek exemption to sanctions so it can cover Iran
Musk debuts Tesla’s first humanoid robot with eye on mass market
Musk says ‘civilisation would crumble’ if sourcing oil and gas in the short term stops

Musk is a social media troll, an unreliable investor, and an entrepreneur of true genius, who specialises in taking spares and parts and putting them together into something that really works.

Buying a $44bn company in a fit of pique and then backing out of it twice would be an incredibly Elon Musk move.

So would using that same pique to turn it into something brilliant.

Related posts:

Roblox shares rocket as it lists on Wall Street – but can the popular platform turn a profit? Toscafund joins opposition to £1bn Spire takeover Millions more using phones and smart watches to make payments Cobham eyes potential disposals after agreeing £2.57bn Ultra takeover deal Inflation, massive cyber IPO and Christmas supply worries Unilever shares rise as it rules out increasing its £50bn consumer healthcare takeover offer to GSK P&O Ferries to resume Dover to Calais sailings with passenger services next week Boots owner sets mid-May deadline for suitors’ £5bn bids Morrisons and McColl’s deal to be investigated Petrol price hits new record after EU ban on Russian oil BBC hires Bain & Co to review strategy as funding squeeze looms Cineworld files for bankruptcy protection in the US