Criminal barristers in England and Wales have voted in favour of an escalation of strike action.

The Criminal Bar Association, which represents lawyers prosecuting and defending those accused of crimes in England and Wales, said its members had backed a plan to go on strike “on an indefinite basis” from Monday 5 September.

They join rail staff, teachers and civil servants in backing or considering industrial action over the coming months at a time when pay awards are lagging behind the four-decade high rate of inflation.

The CBA has said its members have suffered an average decrease in earnings of 28% since 2006 – when taking inflation into account – and has accused the government of refusing to engage in negotiations “aimed at finding a fair settlement”.

Criminal barristers are due to receive a 15% fee rise from the end of September, meaning they will earn £7,000 more per year.

But there has been anger the proposed pay rise will not be made effective immediately and will only apply to new cases, not those already sitting in the backlog waiting to be dealt with by courts.

CBA members have been walking out on alternate weeks, but were balloted on whether to escalate the industrial action.

RAF recruitment head refused ‘unlawful’ order to ‘prioritise women and ethnic minorities over white men’, leaked email reveals

Woman dies in crash which left car on railway track in west London

Liz Truss’ cost of living plans could put people on the streets, claims Rishi Sunak backer

The 14-day ballot closed at midnight on Sunday and the result was announced on Monday morning.

A total of 2,273 members cast their vote with an overwhelming majority – around 80% – backing an uninterrupted strike.

CBA vice chair Kirsty Brimelow QC said this was “last-resort action”.

“The remedy is for an injection of money into the backlog of cases which currently stands at 60,000 cases, that barristers are working on that will cost the government only £1.1 million per month,” she told BBC Breakfast.

“Currently, it’s costing much more for the courts to sit empty.”

Justice Minister Sarah Dines said the escalation of strike action was “wholly unjustified” considering the pending rise in fees.

“This is an irresponsible decision that will only see more victims face further delays and distress,” she said.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) previously said it had “repeatedly explained” to the CBA that backdating pay would require a “fundamental change” in how fees are paid, adding: “That reform would cost a disproportionate amount of taxpayers’ money and would take longer to implement, meaning barristers would have to wait longer for payment.”

More than 6,000 court hearings have been disrupted as a result of the dispute over conditions and government-set fees for legal aid advocacy work, according to MoJ figures.

Data released under freedom of information laws show that during the first 19 days of industrial action – between 27 June and 5 August – 6,235 court cases were disrupted, including 1,415 trials.

Related posts:

Wales to ease COVID rules from Saturday – but face masks still needed indoors and on public transport Euro 2020 final could have been abandoned without police intervention, says Met Recall on Tesco cough medicine which was incorrectly labelled ‘An otherworldly beauty’: Wildlife Photographer of the Year crowns the best animal images of 2021 Insulate Britain blocks M25 to demand insulation of UK homes despite injunction Murder probe after mother and baby die in crash with lorry Boy, five, found dead in river suffered severe injuries ‘consistent with child abuse’, court hears Arsenal fan who suffered racist attack at Liverpool home match ‘had been targeted before’ Ministers warned after ‘prank’ video call with Ben Wallace emerges – as UK blames Russia for hoaxes Seven days of spring sunshine forecast for UK as temperatures could reach 20C, Met Office says Parents of brain-damaged 12-year-old win appeal to have case reconsidered at High Court It’s come home! Lionesses deliver England’s first major trophy since 1966