The Court of Appeal has ruled the first deportation flight taking asylum seekers to Rwanda can go ahead tomorrow.

Rights campaigners have argued that the government policy is inhumane and will put migrants at risk.

But officials have said the strategy will deter people from making dangerous Channel crossings from France in flimsy small boats run by smugglers.

The Home Office believes the removal plan is in the public interest and must not be stopped.

The latest legal challenge comes after the High Court ruled last week that the flight to Rwanda could go ahead.

The appeal court said it “cannot interfere” with the original decision.

Lord Justice Singh said “we consider that the judge produced a detailed and careful judgment which is all the more impressive in view of the time constraints under which he had to give it” in this “urgent and important case”.

Kevin Spacey: Oscar-winning actor charged with four counts of sexual assault by Met Police

Archie Battersbee: Life support for brain-damaged boy, 12, should end as High Court rules he is dead

Dom Phillips: Bodies of British journalist and companion ‘have not been found’ in Amazon rainforest, despite reports

The Public and Commercial Services union (PCS), which represents around 80% of Border Force staff, had brought Monday’s case, alongside charities Care4Calais and Detention Action.

A second case is currently being heard in the High Court after Asylum Aid, a refugee charity, applied for an urgent interim injunction to stop the government flying migrants to Rwanda.

Lawyers for the charity argued the procedure adopted by the government was unfair.

Downing Street has said that it remains the government’s plan for the flight taking asylum seekers to Rwanda to go ahead on Tuesday as planned.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “We certainly intend for there to be a flight tomorrow. That still remains the plan.”

As of Friday, around 130 people have been told they could be moved to Rwanda under the new scheme.

There are 11 people scheduled to be on tomorrow’s flight, although Lord Justice Singh suggested the numbers could now be in single figures.

Raza Husain QC, for two people at risk of removal and the three organisations challenging the government’s policy, had earlier said Mr Justice Swift’s decision last week contained errors of principle or was “plainly wrong”.

He focused on the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees’ (UNHCR) concerns about Britain’s asylum flights.

The UN refugee agency holds an unequivocal position that the flight should not proceed.

Related posts:

The troubling case of Girl G reveals a lot about how we treat vulnerable children in the UK today NatWest posts pre-tax loss of £351m and announces exit from Ireland England’s pubs, restaurants and shops prepare for Monday reopening – but PM postpones his pint Police urge ravers to come forward in hunt for missing teenager Police and protesters face off as Home Office tries to remove people from property on Eid ‘It is damaging for a young person’: Parents call for weighing children at school to be scrapped More storms to come for parts of UK after downpours, lightning and hail ‘the size of peas’ Insulate Britain protesters block roads in Dartford and west London Measles vaccination rates drop to their lowest level in a decade Children sexually exploited in all parts of England as abusers find ‘new ways’ to groom them UK expected to be ‘hotter than Jamaica’ this week – how warm will it be in your area? ‘Family decision’ taken to keep Prince Andrew’s Garter Day appearance private