Angela Rayner has said a Mail on Sunday article that claimed Tory MPs had accused her of a Basic Instinct ploy to distract Boris Johnson was “misogynistic”, “sexist” and “steeped in classism”.

Speaking on ITV’s Lorraine, Labour’s deputy leader said she was “crestfallen” upon hearing that the paper planned to publish the story and described constantly having to “prove my worth” as a female in politics.

Describing the article as “disgusting”, Ms Rayner said the piece “wasn’t just about me as a woman, it was also steeped in classism and about where I come from, where I grew up”.

She added that, despite feeling “really sad” about the story over the weekend, she has been “heartened” by the reaction from members of the public.

Politics Hub: PM urged to come up with new ideas to ease cost of living crisis

Labour’s deputy leader also revealed she had made a conscious decision to wear trousers for the TV interview on Tuesday morning and called for a “culture change” in Parliament.

The story, which reported that Tory MPs had accused Ms Rayner of deliberately distracting Mr Johnson by crossing and uncrossing her legs, has received a huge backlash after its publication.

Angela Rayner remarks: Speaker summons newspaper editor over ‘demeaning’ article

Angela Rayner and Boris Johnson condemn ‘sexist’ and ‘misogynistic’ Mail on Sunday article claiming Tory MPs accuse her of ‘Basic Instinct’ ploy to distract PM

Angela Rayner says Boris Johnson and Keir Starmer represent a choice between the ‘naughty boyfriend’ or ‘the stable one’

Reacting to the article at the weekend, the prime minister posted on social media: “As much as I disagree with Angela Rayner on almost every political issue, I respect her as a parliamentarian and deplore the misogyny directed at her anonymously today.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Culture in parliament ‘sexist and misogynistic

Posting a dignified response to the article on social media on Sunday morning, Ms Rayner thanked those for criticising the piece and “making a stand in the name of decency”.

“I won’t be letting their vile lies deter me. Their attempts to harass and intimidate me will fail,” she added.

Also condemning the article, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said: “The sexism and misogyny peddled by the Tories is a disgraceful new low from a party mired in scandal and chaos.”

Read more:
Speaker summons newspaper editor over ‘demeaning’ article

He added: “We have got to change the culture. The culture in parliament, it is sexist, it is misogynist. We need to change it.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Mail on Sunday editor summoned

After being contacted by Caroline Nokes, the Tory chair of the women and equalities committee, who raised her concerns on the matter, Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay on Monday summoned David Dillon, the editor of the Mail on Sunday, for a meeting.

Sir Lindsay told MPs that the story was “demeaning” and “offensive to women in parliament”, adding that it “can only deter women who might be considering standing for election to the detriment of us all”.

He said he had arranged a meeting with Mr Dillon, the newspaper’s political editor Glen Owen and the chair of the press lobby “to discuss the issue affecting our parliamentary community” and will also separately meet Ms Rayner.

The original Mail on Sunday story likened Ms Rayner’s alleged ploy to a fully clothed equivalent of Sharon Stone’s infamous scene in the film Basic Instinct.

Speaking on today’s Sky News Daily podcast, the longest serving female MP has said sexist and misogynistic briefing against fellow politicians should be regarded as “serious misconduct”.

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts,  Google Podcasts,  Spotify, Spreaker

‘An attempt to shut down and silence women’

Labour’s Harriet Harman said: “If people were in a workplace, a private company and one was briefing against another to the press that would be regarded as serious misconduct. But you look in our own code of conduct, which I’ve got here, and it’s got nothing, nothing in it at all about that.

“It’s all about, you know, not taking public money, which is important and not abusing your staff, which is important, but here it needs a bit of updating. I’ve been leafing through it, and it’s got lots of good things in it, but it actually needs to deal with this as well.”

Ms Harman told Sky News the comments in the Mail on Sunday amounted to an accusation of “flashing”.

“There’s been some reporting that, oh well, it’s about crossing and I’m crossing her legs. I mean, what they’re actually accusing her of is flashing,” she said.

“And what this is about is it’s about men who really don’t like the idea that there are women with the temerity to speak out and be in public life, and it’s a way of shutting them down and silencing them. And you know, why should women members of parliament always be in trepidation about what they wear or how they sit?”

In a tweet on Monday, the Independent Press Standards Organisation, the independent regulator of UK newspapers, said it had received “a high volume of complaints” about the article.

Related posts:

David Cameron ‘told friends it was a mistake’ to text chancellor to lobby him for his employer Review launched into Greensill Capital following David Cameron lobbying row Cummings reveals WhatsApp message which appears to show PM calling Hancock ‘totally f****** hopeless’ Lifting of restrictions could cause friction without clear govt messaging, scientific advisers warn Health Secretary Sajid Javid tests positive for coronavirus and has ‘mild’ symptoms ‘Big gap’ remains between UK and EU over NI Protocol – Frost David Amess MP dies after being stabbed at constituency surgery, police say PM hails ‘game-changing agreement’ at COP26 but says countries need to ‘stand by’ decisions made RAF plane flew hundreds of miles for PM photoshoot before flying straight back Put in context, this was no big giveaway from the chancellor P&O Ferries chief executive to face questions from MPs P&O Ferries boss admits firm broke law and chose not to consult over sackings as ‘no union would accept proposal’