The opening question from the committee chair set the tone.

“Are you in this mess because you don’t know what you’re doing or are you just a shameless criminal?”

It barely improved from there for P&O Ferries CEO, Peter Hebblethwaite.

As committee evidence goes – it could hardly have been more blockbuster.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

An utter mauling by MPs, a remarkable watch with some remarkable admissions.

The key and most headline-grabbing statement was a clear acknowledgement that he knew P&O was breaking the law by not consulting with unions ahead of firing nearly 800 seafaring workers last week.

MPs looked visibly shocked when they pressed him to confirm that he “wilfully broke the law”.

P&O Ferries boss admits firm broke law over sackings – and reveals to MPs new workers earn £5.15 an hour

P&O Ferries chief executive to face questions from MPs

P&O Ferries sackings: Replacing workers with £1.80-an-hour agency staff ‘illegal’, says TUC head Frances O’Grady

“We did not believe that there was any other way to do this,” he said.

Read more: What are the rights of workers and passengers affected by the mass sackings?

P&O’s hope, it seems, is that it would be able to defend itself from consequent legal action using its severance agreements and pay-outs. It was raised in the hearing that the exit contracts include clauses that would withdraw the right of former employees to take future legal action.

P&O has been transparent about the amounts involved in these payouts – more than £36bn – with individuals offered significantly above statutory redundancy.

But MPs were incredulous – this, they said, amounts to “buying your way out of UK law”.

The mauling continued, forced largely on the way these employees have been treated.

Read more: Ian King on why the company has taken the axe to its workforce again

Confidentiality, or gagging clauses in the agreements that would prevent people from talking to the media were described as “thuggery”, some simply laughed in his face when Hebblethwaite said security teams in balaclavas were employed to keep employees “safe”.

There was also outrage over the conditions under which the new workers will be employed.

The average wage of these new seafarers will be £5.50 an hour, with the lowest paid on just £5.15 an hour – well below UK National Minimum Wage. Experts explained that while UK minimum wage should apply when ships are in British ports, it doesn’t once a ship is in international waters, a complex legal set up that may need some ironing out.

And there could well be other legal wrangling to come, not least over whether the law was broken with regards to who was notified and when.

It’s now clear that P&O was not obliged to notify the UK Secretary of State that it was making this large number of redundancies. Changes in legislation meant it only had to notify authorities in the countries where the ships are registered (Cyprus, the Bahamas and Bermuda).

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

However, legal experts said it would be a breach of UK law if those notifications weren’t made in accordance with local laws (45 days before the redundancies in Cyprus, 30 days in Bahamas and Bermuda).

And we know they weren’t – in Hebblethwaite’s letter to the government on Monday he states they were altered on March 17th, the day of the sackings.

While Hebblethwaite himself didn’t seem to agree this was another legal breach, after what happened this morning it’s inconceivable he’s not worried. Legal experts emphasised there could be a host of other cases ex-employees could bring, from discrimination to unfair dismissal.

But he’ll be worried too about whether the brand can recover, whether passengers will vote with their feet.

He accepted in the hearing that the brand has “taken a hit”, but that feels like an understatement. A similar case involving such sudden levels of brutal, and now admittedly, illegal conduct can hardly be recalled.

Hebblethwaite repeated numerous times that without these moves the company would have failed. But the cost of how it was handled is mounting in financial, legal and reputational terms.

Related posts:

JD Sports edges out rivals in race to buy Arcadia warehouse Freeports ahoy! The post-Brexit measure unleashed in Sunak’s budget Cautious chancellor hands short-term relief to UK businesses but hints at payback to come Kwarteng axes star-studded council with hint at BEIS rebranding Cobham eyes potential disposals after agreeing £2.57bn Ultra takeover deal Franco Manca scopes out 150 potential new restaurants Inflation, massive cyber IPO and Christmas supply worries Dismal summer for retail as sales fall for fourth month in a row Mixed bag for Ocado as labour shortage hurts retail arm but group wins patent victory The Bank of England has raised interest rates: What will it mean for you? Unilever shares rise as it rules out increasing its £50bn consumer healthcare takeover offer to GSK Wagamama owner warns bounce-back in consumer confidence after Plan B may take a while