The sentences handed to Arthur Labinjo-Hughes’s father and stepmother have been referred to the Court of Appeal for being too lenient.
The pair were convicted for killing the six-year-old, who was left with an unsurvivable brain injury while in the care of his father’s “evil” partner, Emma Tustin.
Arthur’s body was also covered in 130 bruises.
Earlier this month, Tustin, 32, was found guilty of murder and handed a life sentence with a minimum term of 29 years.
Arthur’s father Thomas Hughes, 29, was found guilty of manslaughter and jailed for 21 years.
Both were also convicted of child cruelty.
The boy, from Solihull, West Midlands, was poisoned, starved and beaten by his Tustin and Hughes in a prolonged campaign of abuse.
COVID-19: More than two million in UK had coronavirus in week before Christmas – ONS estimate
COVID-19: ‘Significant increases’ in patients with coronavirus – as Northampton hospital suspends visitors
Ghislaine Maxwell a ‘scapegoat’ and she won’t ‘flip’ to help prosecutors, says brother
Speaking about the case, Attorney General Suella Braverman said: “My thoughts are with all those who loved Arthur Labinjo-Hughes.
“This is an extremely upsetting and disturbing case, involving a clearly vulnerable young child.
“Emma Tustin and Thomas Hughes grossly abused their position of trust and subjected an innocent child, who they should have been protecting, to continued emotional and physical abuse.
“I understand how distressing the public have found this case, but it is my job to decide if a sentence appears to be unduly lenient based on the facts of the case.
“I have carefully considered the details of this case, and I have decided to refer the sentences to the Court of Appeal as I believe them to be too low.”