Banksy has designed a T-shirt that he is selling to raise funds for four people accused of pulling down a statue during a Black Lives Matter protest in Bristol.
The street artist hopes the proceeds will allow the four people facing trial for criminal damage in relation to the toppling of the statue of 17th century slave trader Edward Colston to “go for a pint”.
Images of the limited edition grey souvenir T-shirts have been posted on Banksy’s Instagram feed and on his website.
The clothing has the word Bristol written over the top in capital letters with a picture of Colston’s empty plinth underneath.
What happened in Bristol?
The Colston statue was pulled down last year during a Black Lives Matter protest less than two weeks after the murder of George Floyd by police officer Derek Chauvin in Minneapolis.
Banksy said on his website: “Next week the four people charged with pulling down Colston’s statue in Bristol are going on trial.
Banksy’s £10m pledge for bid to transform prison into a ‘refuge for art’
Banksy art carved off wall in Lowestoft so it can be sold in US for millions
Terminally ill man arrested for mooning speed camera ‘inspires’ new ‘Banksy’ Bart Simpson mural
“I’ve made some souvenir shirts to mark the occasion. Available from various outlets in the city from tomorrow (all proceeds to the defendants).”
On Instagram he added: “All proceeds to the defendants so they can go for a pint.”
The Bristol-based artist said sales would be limited to one per person and each T-shirt would cost £25 plus VAT.
Who are the accused?
Rhian Graham, 29, Milo Ponsford, 25, Jake Skuse, 36, and Sage Willoughby, 21, are due to go on trial at Bristol Crown Court on Monday.
The bronze memorial was toppled on 7 June last year before being dumped in Bristol Harbour.
It was later recovered by the city council and put on public display in a different location.
Charges against the four defendants allege that they, without lawful excuse, jointly and with others, damaged the statue, a listed monument belonging to the city council.
The defendants are accused of “intending to destroy or damage such property or being reckless as to whether such property would be destroyed or damaged”.