A junior council worker who thought they were testing a dummy website rejected and approved real planning applications, adding a sarcastic comment to each – with the decisions now legally binding.

One applicant, a charity boss at an animal sanctuary, was told by Swale Borough Council her plans were turned down because “Your proposal is whack”, with a second comment adding, “No mate, proper whack”.

Another, seeking to change a butchers to a hot food takeaway with a delivery service, was refused with the comments “just dont” and “no”.

Two applications to demolish separate pubs were both approved, with the responses “incy wincy spider” and “why am I doing this am I the chosen one”.

The Kent authority said that on 19 August a “testing error occurred which published dummy decision notices on five randomly selected Swale applications on the live system”.

After the council was alerted to the mistake, the decisions were removed from the site.

However, “legal advice has subsequently confirmed they are legally binding and must be overturned before the correct decisions are made.”

It could take up to three months to have the decisions quashed via a judicial review.

The leader and deputy leader of the council said in a statement they were “angered and frustrated” by the “administrative error”.

Cllrs Roger Truelove and Mike Baldock said: “These errors will have to be rectified but this will cause totally unnecessary concern to applicants.

“This is not the first serious problem following the transfer of our planning administration to Mid Kent shared services.

“We will wait for the outcome of a proper investigation and then consider our appropriate response as a council.”

A statement from the local authority added: “In addition to the incorrect decisions, some of the dummy text used to test the software was not appropriate for publication, including derogatory comments about the quality of the applications.

“This language was used by a junior officer with no knowledge of any of the applications, who believed they were working solely in a test environment and that the comments would never be published.”

An investigation is under way to understand what happened and may result in action against the officers involved, the borough council said.

Related posts:

Say hello and bag the dog poo – the Countryside Code is relaunched Research reveals the Mary Rose’s multi-national crew UK records 29,312 new COVID cases and 119 deaths in latest 24-hour period Full list of updated green, amber and red countries – and the rules when you travel Baby and young children among people in Channel brought ashore after more than 150 migrants crossed into UK British tennis player Emma Raducanu through to quarter-finals of US Open Police appeal after motorcyclists seen riding over a seal pup Sir Lewis Hamilton says he had ‘nothing to do’ with Mercedes deal with Grenfell firm ‘Completely outrageous’: Thousands of homes still without power nine days after Storm Arwen British teen ‘fully accepted’ she would lose a foot after being attacked by crocodile Metropolitan Police officer charged with 29 offences against eight women, including rape and sexual assault PM ‘going nowhere’ as MPs demand answers over Downing Street party