The Scottish government will go to court in September to challenge Westminster’s decision to block its much-debated gender reform bill.

Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville confirmed in April that Holyrood would lodge a legal bid to contest the UK government’s use of a section 35 order to stop the bill from receiving royal assent and becoming law.

The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service has now confirmed a three-day hearing to consider the case will take place at the Court of Session in Edinburgh between 19-21 September.

It will be heard by Lady Haldane, a judge who ruled in 2022 that the definition of sex was “not limited to biological or birth sex”.

In what became known as “the Haldane decision”, she judged that in the context of the 2010 Equality Act, sex referred to a person’s sex recognised by law, and not simply their biological sex.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The controversial Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill was passed by MSPs just before Christmas.

The bill aims to simplify the process for trans people to change gender in the eyes of the law.

No diagnosis or medical reports would be required, and the period in which adult applicants need to have lived in their acquired gender would be cut to three months.

Teenagers aged 16 and 17 applying for a gender recognition certificate would have to live in their acquired gender for at least six months.

Critics have argued the proposals undermine women’s rights and single-sex spaces.

Read more:
Why is the bill controversial?

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Sky News app for free

It became a constitutional dispute in January when the UK’s Scottish Secretary Alister Jack took the unprecedented step of using Section 35 of the Scotland Act to prevent the bill from gaining royal assent.

Mr Jack claimed the bill clashed with UK-wide equality laws, and argued differing systems of gender recognition north and south of the border would create “significant complications”.

First Minister Humza Yousaf has previously insisted that if the Scottish government had failed to challenge the use of Section 35 this would send a “signal that the UK government can veto any legislation they disagree with at a whim”.

The SNP leader added that legal action was the “only means of defending our parliament’s democracy from the Westminster veto”.

However, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the UK government had taken “very careful and considered advice” on the issue.

In response to the Scottish government’s legal challenge, the UK government said it would “robustly defend” Mr Jack’s decision.

Related posts:

‘I just want to hold them’: Dad’s tribute after his two children, their mother and friend ‘on a sleepover’ are killed Princess Beatrice ‘so delighted’ after giving birth to a daughter Manchester to get a ‘green lung’ with its first city park in 100 years Bradford Council stripped of children’s and social care services in wake of Star Hobson’s death Under-12s rugby player cruelly trolled heading to final at Twickenham after support from game’s biggest stars Johnson reminds Tory MPs of sweeping electoral victory under his leadership ahead of confidence vote The food bank that ran out of food – because people can no longer afford to donate Boris Johnson narrowly survives confidence vote – but suffers significant Tory rebellion Heading to Cornwall? Take your own medicine, travellers told Johnson told to stop asking Richard Sharp for financial advice days before he was made BBC chair – reports Phillip Schofield ‘took us for fools’, says ex-This Morning presenter Boy, 15, dies and second boy, 14, in critical condition after group of teens ‘got into difficulty’ in river